lolabobs: (angels)
[personal profile] lolabobs
As is my wont, and I ended up in a debate with myself.

I posited to myself that "Not attractive" wasn't the same as "unattractive." I agreed with myself.

Then I thought, well it's almost like a scale:

Attractive... not attractive...unattractive.

And then I got to wondering where "not unattractive" would fit in.

Is it:

Attractive...not attractive...not unattractive...unattractive.

or does "not unattractive" mean more attractive than "not attractive", in which case it would go:

Attractive....not unattractive....not attractive...unattractive.

By this time I was completely addled, losing the will to live and drawing some strange glances as I tried to make sense of it all.

Also, do you know how hard it is to type "attractive" a trillion times in one post?!

It's not my fault - the sky wasn't such a distraction this evening.

 photo P1020058_zps896916bb.jpg

Date: 2013-08-03 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kat-lair.livejournal.com
Lol! For my 'not unattractive' is more attractive than 'not attractive'.

But then again, it's all subjective! Attractiveness and its sliding scales...

Date: 2013-08-11 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lolabobs.livejournal.com
Thnk you for indulging me!

Profile

lolabobs: (Default)
lolabobs

October 2013

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 03:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios